Tilted Forum Project Discussion Community

Go Back   Tilted Forum Project Discussion Community > Interests > Tilted Technology
New! Use your Facebook, Google, AIM & Yahoo accounts to securely log into this site, click logo to login  
Register Register Blogs Members List Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 09-22-2009, 05:47 AM   #1 (permalink)
pinche vato
 
warrrreagl's Avatar
 
Location: Land of cotton.
Blog Entries: 25
Anti-Photo Shield

There is an article here on Wired Magazine about a Russian billionaire installing an "anti-photography" device on his yacht to keep the press at bay. Rather than quote the entire article, I'll sum it up by basically saying that the device sweeps the area around the yacht in a constant laser sphere until it detects electronic light sensors in a nearby camera. At that point, it fires a beam of light at the camera and disables it from recording a digital image.

Is this dangerous to the eys of the person looking through the camera? What are your thoughts? Have paparazzi brought this on themselves?
__________________
Living is easy with eyes closed.
warrrreagl is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-22-2009, 07:35 AM   #2 (permalink)
Junkie
 
Craven Morehead's Avatar
 
The sensor on the yacht seeks out CCDs (wish they would have expanded on how it works in the article). In a digital SLR the CCD is not exposed until the image is captured, otherwise it is covered by a mirror reflecting the scene being viewed into the viewfinder. Therefore the photographer is not viewing the scene through the camera since the mirror would have flipped out of the way of the CCD when the image is captured. However, the scanning laser could possibly be harmful. I would have thought any possible health effects would have been covered in the article.
Craven Morehead is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-22-2009, 11:52 AM   #3 (permalink)
MSD
Why would you ever want to be like me?
 
MSD's Avatar
 
Moderator
Location: CT
Depending on the delay between detection and response, an SLR with a sufficiently high shutter speed could probably defeat this, but whoever is looking through the lens could easily be blinded after the mirror sets back into place.

What's going to be funny is when some guy with a 35mm SLR and a huge telephoto lens with an IR filter starts snapping pictures.
__________________
If you catch the evil twin, then why would you keep it alive?
MSD is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-22-2009, 11:57 AM   #4 (permalink)
Evil Priest: The Devil Made Me Do It!
 
Daniel_'s Avatar
 
Location: Southern England
Blog Entries: 11
Quote:
Originally Posted by MSD View Post
Depending on the delay between detection and response, an SLR with a sufficiently high shutter speed could probably defeat this, but whoever is looking through the lens could easily be blinded after the mirror sets back into place.

What's going to be funny is when some guy with a 35mm SLR and a huge telephoto lens with an IR filter starts snapping pictures.
My first thought!
__________________
╔═════════════════════════════════════════╗
Overhead, the Albatross hangs motionless upon the air,
And deep beneath the rolling waves,
In labyrinths of Coral Caves,
The Echo of a distant time
Comes willowing across the sand;
And everthing is Green and Submarine

╚═════════════════════════════════════════╝
Daniel_ is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-22-2009, 03:41 PM   #5 (permalink)
Eye See You
 
Zeraph's Avatar
 
Location: The Cosmos
Sounds more like an automated laser pointer device. I'm sure the lasers they're using are not mad scientist grade and aren't going to hurt the photographer. You don't need much extra light to ruin a photo.
__________________
"What silence can there be,
what lack of sound compare
to a snowfall from dark air
falling quietly to sea?"


luv ya
Zeraph is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-22-2009, 03:51 PM   #6 (permalink)
Evil Priest: The Devil Made Me Do It!
 
Daniel_'s Avatar
 
Location: Southern England
Blog Entries: 11
But if it seeks CCD it will be thrown off by film, and if it seeks IR it will be thrown off by distance/manual focus
__________________
╔═════════════════════════════════════════╗
Overhead, the Albatross hangs motionless upon the air,
And deep beneath the rolling waves,
In labyrinths of Coral Caves,
The Echo of a distant time
Comes willowing across the sand;
And everthing is Green and Submarine

╚═════════════════════════════════════════╝
Daniel_ is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-23-2009, 09:16 AM   #7 (permalink)
MSD
Why would you ever want to be like me?
 
MSD's Avatar
 
Moderator
Location: CT
Quote:
Originally Posted by Zeraph View Post
Sounds more like an automated laser pointer device. I'm sure the lasers they're using are not mad scientist grade and aren't going to hurt the photographer. You don't need much extra light to ruin a photo.
It doesn't take much to damage an eye, especially if a laser is focused through an SLR's lens.
__________________
If you catch the evil twin, then why would you keep it alive?
MSD is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-27-2009, 10:10 AM   #8 (permalink)
Eye See You
 
Zeraph's Avatar
 
Location: The Cosmos
Quote:
Originally Posted by MSD View Post
It doesn't take much to damage an eye, especially if a laser is focused through an SLR's lens.
I don't know. I've heard of it happening but I've been hit with handheld (strong though) laser pointers in the eye several times. Like direct hits where I'm blinded for several minutes. But my vision has always returned to normal. Maybe I'm just lucky.
__________________
"What silence can there be,
what lack of sound compare
to a snowfall from dark air
falling quietly to sea?"


luv ya
Zeraph is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-27-2009, 12:33 PM   #9 (permalink)
feeling lascivious ...
 
Xerxys's Avatar
 
Location: Cary, NC.
Blog Entries: 37
Why is it wrong to blind someone then?

This is rather shaky area for me. I have a right to privacy. Understand that not all that can be seen is fair game. I have a right for you not to be taking photos of me just the way I can put barbed wire over my fence to prevent burglars.

I feel it beats reason, I'm not walking down the street naked and I am ok with people having their picture taken while on the street, there is no privacy there. But in their own secluded home if someone goes through the trouble of climbing over hedges and perching precariously on a branch to take a naked picture of me then they do deserve to be blinded by the fail safes placed to prevent that.
__________________
Proper planning and preparation prevents piss poor performance.
Xerxys is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-29-2009, 03:13 PM   #10 (permalink)
Crazy
 
Location: at home
How does one detect a CCD with a laser since it is a passive device ?
Could it be a low power IR laser that constantly sweeps a sphere around the yacht that could interfer with CCD but would be invisible to naked eye ?

Trivia of the day: Digital cameras can be used to see if IR remotes are transmitting.
__________________
Sodomy non sapiens. : I'm buggered if I know
Zweiblumen is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-29-2009, 06:58 PM   #11 (permalink)
Currently sour but formerly Dlishs
 
dlish's Avatar
 
Moderator
Location: Australia/UAE
Blog Entries: 11
i didnt read the article..its too early to think here..

what if you didnt use the flash?
__________________
An injustice anywhere, is an injustice everywhere
"Romance is never having to apologize for getting it in her hair" - World's King
dlish is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Tags
antiphoto, shield

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 02:35 AM.

Contact Us - Tilted Forum Project - Archive - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0
All text © 2002-2009 Tilted Forum Project
"Insignia" vBulletin 3.5 - b6gm6n - x7x7x7.com