Latch

I don't want to turn this into another "what distro do you use" thread.. but I thought this article may be interesting to some. It's an analysis of Redhat Linux and SuSE Linux.

I won't copy the whole article, as it's kinda long... so.. linky is Here.

sailor

To be honest, I have never tried SuSE. I really should, I have heard good things about it. RedHat I do have experience with, and its pretty damn good. That article is pretty good.

__________________
"Good people do not need laws to tell them to act responsibly, while bad people will find a way around the laws."
--Plato

RelaX

I have used both Red Hat and SuSe but nowadays my vote goes to Red Hat. A year ago I was a die-hard SuSe fan but I got tired of compiling most packages from scratch and chasing dependencies all over the place (my biggest problem with Linux so far).
Other than that, SuSe pretty much beats RH with support, ease of use and general slick-looky-ness.

__________________
The most likely way for the world to be destroyed, most experts agree, is by accident. That's where we come in; we're computer professionals. We cause accidents.
- Nathaniel Borenstein

Holo

Red hat always gave me trouble with network cards and soundcards. Every time It would never detect shit. SuSE always did right out of the box,and with their autoupdate feature installation of many programs is too easy. I don't install Linux anymore tho, I use Knoppix.

__________________
I happen to like the words "fuck", "cock", "pussy", "tits", "cunt", "twat", "shit" and even "bitch". As long as I am not using them to describe you, don't go telling me whether or not I can/should use them...that is, if you want me to continue refraining from using them to describe you. ~Prince

Krycheck

I've never had problems with RH other than it not automounting my Fat32 partitions. I've loved RH since 8.0 and I know use Fedora.

I hear so much about SuSe that I may give it a try next time around.

__________________

His pants are tight...but his morals are loose!!